I disagree.
Anyone who uses Ubuntu has a good chance of being new to Linux and wants an EZPZ installer. Atleast throw one in for them.
Wat r u talk’n bout
who the hell is voting for FreeBSD
dont be talkin shit
or risk gettin hit
I can tell Sparky made this poll. Who in their right mind plays on 5 DIFFERENT FUCKING OPERATING SYSTEMS.
Probably hoping Linux gets picked more?
The poll makes no sense. The %'s don’t add up to 100? What?
To be fair, Linux is far more fragmented than Windows, so I’m not surprised Sparky added voting options for those to gauge interest across distros.
However as BlowFish brought up:
we can build static builds for linux and scrub the need for independant linux distro’s
It seems the percentages are determined by giving an equal wait to each vote of each voter. At the time I make this post, there are 20 voters, which means the weight is 5% for each vote. So if 6 people vote for a particular option, the value associate with that option would be 6 times 5%, or in other words 30%.
static builds is one thing, but what i miss currently the most is just a working master branch and fully automated / documented build pipeline. i tried to clone and build but there is no instructions, make is not enough, some folders have to be copied from somewhere, and this knowledge is missing. a good practice is give a link to the repo to an outsider and tell him to build the app without any additional ‘and remember to …’
My all PCs are Windows 8.1, but I had Windows 10 in my laptop only.
Also I hope those programs will compatible like Windows 7, but Ubuntu also have it because I like Ubuntu! 
@newb where is this repo everyone is talking about? The GH Gitlab repos have some documentation that I have been developing, but I don’t think those are released to public yet.
They add up to 173%, kek
Retarded indeed
It’s because it’s multiple votes per person. The percentage indicated is a % of participants choosing that option, not the % in relation to other options.
It’s now clear (if it wasn’t before) a W7/W10 build should be priority.
I’m not surprised. Windows 7 is pretty stable and those who moved on took the Windows 10 upgrade. It’ll be interesting to see how another poll in the future works out.
We no need create clients manually for winxp/vista/7/8/10
MinGW build of Trem works in all Windows.
But problem is, those all people doesn’t like Vista because it’s shitty, also XP is already 15 years old and now obsoleted, so we are mostly at least Windows 7 or later for both 32-bit/64-bit, and other OS will be support for Mac, Linux and Ubuntu for also both 32/64 bit.
So I hope you stop wasting to do for old OSes. And yes, that will support for all Windows, but must take discussion about Tremulous 1.3 project for that will going support what kind of OS and what kind of source engine to make launcher/installer.
1 Like
Billy as i said, todo is same for any os…Source code and OS is different things
While we are compiling exe, they gonna works in almsot all Windows (Probably XP+)
So min specs:
WinXP, Some GPU with 3d
512 mb ram (1 gb for Vista, but dont worry…anyway if no enought ram, swap will save you)
Some Pentium from 2000-2003 (ofc minimum, recommended some lga775 cpu like pentium)
1 Like
Using 64 bit on arch linux … no need to make package … just release code and I can compile it.
Edit: easiest way for arch linux package … make request here: AUR Issues, Discussion & PKGBUILD Requests / Arch Linux Forums … with a little luck, some guy will make package for the Arch User Repository (AUR) … a community-driven repository for Arch users.
This topic is no longer a banner. It will no longer appear at the top of every page.